If you can’t handle math, or managing lists, how the hell are we supposed to trust you with writing an operating system for a computer?
- Windows 1.0
- Windows 2.0
- Windows 3.0
- Windows 3.1
- Windows for Workstations 3.11
- Windows NT 3.1
- Windows NT 3.5
- Windows 95
- Windows NT 4.0
- Windows 95 OSR2
- Windows 98
- Windows 98 SE
- Windows ME
- Windows 2000
- Windows XP
- Windows Vista
- Windows 7
You may question whether some of these are actually different versions, but I am taking the view that if Microsoft didn’t have an upgrade utility, and made you go out and buy a new copy to get the ‘new version’, than it is a distinct software release. Microsoft set the rules, that Windows 95 OSR2 and Windows 98 SE were not ‘upgrades’; so they can’t complain if I hold them to their own definitions.
This is my short list, and isn’t nearly as extensive as some other lists, and I still count at least 17 major versions of Windows. Does this mean that Windows 7 is the tech we should have gotten ten versions ago?
[ad#adsense-horizontal]