LOST: Damn, I hate being wrong…

The Wacky World of Chris Knight » LOST
Charlie doesn’t have to die!!!
Posted in LOST at 2:54 pm by ChrisKnight

Desmond is wrong. Not because his vision was wrong, but rather because it was incomplete and therefore his interpretation was incorrect.

How could I know his vision was incomplete when we were not shown it? “Elementary, my dear Watson…” We have seen two of Desmond’s visions. One when he was thrown backwards into time, and one where he was thrown into the future. In both instances his journey was viewed from a first person perspective: his. At no time did he see things that were outside his own physical perceptions. He may be unstuck in time, but he is not omnipresent.

Desmond tells Charlie that he sees Claire and the baby get on a helicopter, so we know Desmond returns to the beach. He _knows_ that helicopter will never come unless Charlie goes to the Looking Glass Station. The plan was not for them both to go down, but for only one of them. While Desmond was willing to take Charlie’s place, he still never suggested they both go. So, if Charlie was meant to go alone, Desmond would not be able to see what happened after Charlie went into the water. Whether Desmond’s vision included Charlie wacking him with an oar or not, Desmond’s vision of Charlie ended around the point Charlie entered the water.

I do hate being wrong. Then again, one of the things I like about LOST is that it challenges me. I guess wrong about LOST all the time, and that doesn’t happen with other shows. They practice an artful misdirection that other shows just can’t master.

So, of course, they stripped away my wonderful logical reasons for thinking that Desmond was wrong. They sent him down into the water, where he could watch it all happen; and they did it in a way where Charlie floods the room he is in, and leaves Desmond safe to return to the surface. Bastards!!!

So, now I am going to nit-pick. I am going to point out a technical flaw in the way they killed Charlie. Why? because I can be a bastard too!!!

The Looking Glass Station was a pressurized under-water facility. We know this because it had an open-port entry point on the bottom. For every 33 feet of water there is an additional 14 PSI of air pressure, otherwise the Looking Glass would have flooded through the open entry port.

When Mikhail held the grenade up to the port-hole for Charlie to see, Charlie ran to the hatch, pulled in inward, and dogged the latches. Remember this…

The force of the grenade exploding shatters the porthole, and the room floods. And this is where they screwed up… It flooded all the way. This is a pressurized station. Charlie is in a sealed room. The water should have only risen to the top edge of the porthole. Charlie should have been left with breathable air. If Charlie’s room wasn’t sealed, and had an air vent connecting to the rest of the station, then the rest of the station should have flooded as well, but only to the height of the port-hole.

Now, assuming that the porthole was too small for Charlie to wiggle through, there were still options for him. The hatch closed inward, which means that even with positive water pressure in the room Charlie would have been able to open the door to escape. Desmond could have slapped regulators on a couple of tanks, strapped his on, and been ready to grab Charlie and hand him a regulator. He would have had plenty of time, because the station still would not have flooded above the level of the blown porthole.

So, damn them! Charlie still didn’t have to die!!!

-Chris Knight

Not satisfied with the HEROES Finale?

Not satisfied with the HEROES Finale?
5/27/2007
Posted by Frosty

My two favorite TV shows had their finales last week and while one completely blew my mind Lost, the other was a huge disappointment Heroes.

My biggest gripe with the finale of “Heroes” had to be the lack of a kick ass battle which had everyone involved. The show spent all season long talking about this big moment and when it finally happened, all they could come up with was a short, meaningless battle that resolved nothing. The finale should’ve been where all the characters came together and joined a common cause – defeating Sylar. Instead we had a lot of wasted time and some pretty bad dialogue. And I know that I wasn’t alone thinking “Heroes” let the fans down.

So if you felt like I did… I‘ve got something cool for you to read. I’ll call it the “Heroes” WHAT IF finale.

If you liked Heroes when it started, you should go and read the above article. The mental picture I get while reading the proposed “what if” ending is much better than the real thing.

-Chris Knight

Party Membership does’t always mean Party Corruption

In high school we learned about Democrats and Republicans in civics class. I identified with the Republicans, until Reagan got into office and Republicans started pushing government backed morality… How does the ‘smaller government’ party justify injecting themselves into people’s private lives? Any hypocritical way they can…

Do I want the Democrats using my money to fund social programs for people who would rather be on the dole than working? No fracking way.

The Green Party is too idealogical to be practical, and the Libertarians think that trimming back the government to the barest bones and letting the free market rule, despite a hundred years of history of large companies turning evil when not heavily policed, is the best policy. I’m not against small government, but I am practical enough to realize that population densities in this country are too high to exist without some governmental presence.

For the record I despise the ‘Bushies’, and all the other Republicans that think that party loyalty is more important than upholding the ideals of the constitution. (For the record, I also despise Democrats that do so as well.) But there is one Republican candidate for President that is reviving my high school nostalgia for the republical party as an ideal: Ron Paul

Hid voting record is consistently in-line with the ideals set out in the Constitution, and he speaks what he knows to be true and doesn’t back down just to save a little face. Watch this interview. He is given the chance, several times, to back away from statements that he made, that were accurate but not ‘party line’, and he stands firm. There are NO other Republican candidates willing to do that. (As for the Democrats, just watch any interview where Mrs. Clinton dodges questions about her vote on the Iraq war…)

The two best candidates in the race so far are Mike Gravel (D) and Ron Paul (R). If there is any real karmic justice in the Universe they will each win their respective primaries and then no matter who wins we’ll have a decent American and Human Being in the Oval Office. (My gods, I bet that room will take a five pound bag of sage to properly cleanse…)

-Chris Knight

I use Amazon affiliate links in some of my posts. I think it is fair to say my writing is not influenced by the $0.40 I earned in 2022.