A bitter eye opener about Sugar

Until today, I thought High Fructose Corn Syrup was the problem; and now I know better. The video is a little long, but 1.5 hours spent watching this video just might add years to your life.

For the past few years I’ve been reading the labels on food and passing over anything that says “High Fructose Corn Syrup”. Quite a few things have made it into my regular menu despite rather high sugar contents. Tonight I realized one of my favorite breads had as the third largest ingredient “Organic Sugar Cane Concentrate” (liquid sucrose), which turns out to not be any better.

Sucrose, High Fructose Corn Syrup, they are both equally toxic. That was something new I learned today.

[ad#adsense-horizontal]

DNS: One ring to rule them all, one ring to find them, and in the darkness BIND them!

Google has rolled out a new service that they claim will improve DNS resolution speed for end users. All you have to do is use their DNS for everything. Oddly, traditional DNS systems shun this centralized approach; preferring to distribute DNS servers at ISPs where local caches are maintained to reduce overall traffic. Maybe, by having a larger requester pool, the Google cache will reduce traffic to authoritative servers for domains; but the overall amount of DNS traffic leaving ISPs to hit Google’s servers will increase across the general Internet. So, as a technical approach to improving the Internet, this seems dubious.

Leaving the technical, the privacy ramifications are truly frightening. Google already tracks when you search for something on their site, and when you click the links in the results. (You think you are clicking on www.weirdstuffyouwouldnotwantknowninpolitecompany.com, but you are really clicking on a google link that records the activity and then forwards you to the page you wanted to visit for ‘research purposes’.) If you use Google DNS they can now track the places you go when you don’t use Google to search. The places you have bookmarked. The places that aren’t even web pages. Every time your computer needs to resolve a name to an IP address, Google will be listening. SSH, Skype, chat… All logged. Think your torrenting is safe from spying because all those peer connections are only IP addresses? Well, not anymore! Every time your computer automatically reverse maps those IP addresses Google will be listening. Those expert data miners at Google will probably be able to cross-reference your lookups with thousands of others. Google doesn’t list major torrent sites in their top results anymore, but you know they are monitoring them. Combine that with reverse DNS queries and Google will probably be able to tell which episode of Gossip Girl you are downloading while your wife is at work.

Configuring your network settings to use Google Public DNSWhen you use Google Public DNS, you are changing your DNS "switchboard" operator from your ISP to Google Public DNS.In most cases, the IP addresses used by your ISP's domain name servers are automatically set by your ISP via the Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol DHCP. To use Google Public DNS, you need to explicitly change the DNS settings in your operating system or device to use the Google Public DNS IP addresses. The procedure for changing your DNS settings varies according to operating system and version Windows, Mac or Linux or the device computer, phone, or router. We give general procedures here that might not apply for your OS or device; please consult your vendor documentation for authoritative information.

via Using Google Public DNS.

Google’s motto may be ‘Do no evil’, but Google is a publicly traded company that is beholden to their shareholders. How can they truly do no evil when they really don’t control their own destiny anymore, and they just plain have so much power that absolute corruption is at this point inevitable?

-Chris

[ad#adsense-horizontal]

Windows 7 – Proving Microsoft Can’t Add

If you can’t handle math, or managing lists, how the hell are we supposed to trust you with writing an operating system for a computer?

  1. Windows 1.0
  2. Windows 2.0
  3. Windows 3.0
  4. Windows 3.1
  5. Windows for Workstations 3.11
  6. Windows NT 3.1
  7. Windows NT 3.5
  8. Windows 95
  9. Windows NT 4.0
  10. Windows 95 OSR2
  11. Windows 98
  12. Windows 98 SE
  13. Windows ME
  14. Windows 2000
  15. Windows XP
  16. Windows Vista
  17. Windows 7

You may question whether some of these are actually different versions, but I am taking the view that if Microsoft didn’t have an upgrade utility, and made you go out and buy a new copy to get the ‘new version’, than it is a distinct software release. Microsoft set the rules, that Windows 95 OSR2 and Windows 98 SE were not ‘upgrades’; so they can’t complain if I hold them to their own definitions.

This is my short list, and isn’t nearly as extensive as some other lists, and I still count at least 17 major versions of Windows. Does this mean that Windows 7 is the tech we should have gotten ten versions ago?

[ad#adsense-horizontal]

I use Amazon affiliate links in some of my posts. I think it is fair to say my writing is not influenced by the $0.40 I earned in 2022.