Customer Service, the ‘Sprint Way’

About two months ago Sprint announced a change to their ‘unlimited’ EVDO wireless broadband service. ‘Unlimited’ now means less than 5GB per month, or they they reserve the right to cap you, charge you more, or suspend your account. You know, typical Sprint ‘service’.

I read about the plan change on a friend’s blog, but I was having a hard time confirming it. I called Sprint, and the helpful monkey swore up and down that there were no changes being made to my account; and that Sprint did not make material changes to existing contracts anyways. Despite these assurances, I found a couple of geek news sites that supported my friend’s post, so I wrote Sprint customer service. I was informed that they had sent me a statement with the changes in the terms. I never received my 05/23 statement, the one that had the notification of plan change. Mel didn’t get her statement with the notification either, so she asked them to send her a reprint. I do not consider a 2″x2″ block of text that says your terms are changing and to contact customer service for details to be adequate notice. I think that was a pretty big ‘screw you’ for such a small block of text.

Today I called, with a week to spare, to cancel my account. The first monkey asked me why I was canceling my account. I explained that on 5/23 Sprint had sent me notification that they were changing the terms of service on my ‘unlimited’ broadband account, and that since it was no longer unlimited I was going to take my business elsewhere. He then had the audacity to try to convince me that my plan was still unlimited, as long as I did not hit the limit. I have to admit, if I threw out all logic and facts, his argument might have made sense. Being that he was full of shit, I told him that my mind was made up and that I wanted to cancel my account. At which point he transferred me.

The next person I talked to started off fairly reasonable. I explained my situation, and that I was canceling my account because I did not agree with Sprint’s change to my service plan. She confirmed in my account notes that I could cancel without penalty, and she told me she would cancel my account. Then she went off the deep end. She said that since I had a network modem, what she could do for me was trade it in for a cell phone. I asked “Why on Earth would I want to do that?” She said it was so I could keep my sprint account active. Apparently Sprint’s customer service division is located in Oz, or some other place where the grass is blue and the skies are green. I had to explain that since I only had the EVDO modem for data, not for voice, I really had no use for a Sprint cell phone, and that I just wanted to terminate my account. Supposedly this is done, and I will get a final statement that does not include a termination fee. I’m not holding my breath, as have little faith that Sprint will do this right.

[ad#adsense-horizontal]

Nobody can ever use the ‘geek defense’ again. Thanks Hans, you asshole.

Mel and I both read the sfgate blog while the trial was going on. There were lots of things that Mr Reiser did that the prosecution found suspicious, but which made perfect sense to me and Mel. If I were suspected of a crime, and I found a GPS tracking unit on my car, I’d disable it too; whether I was guilty or innocent. (OK, to be honest, I’d transfer it to another car.) Being the intelligent and inquisitive people that we are, we’d probably read up on investigation techniques. As for pulling the batteries out of cell phones, I’d do it too if I thought government agencies were actively using mine to track me. (Let’s not even get into the likelihood that that data is already being logged for potential future review. There is a downside to storage having gotten so cheap…)

Mel an I were appalled that several of the jurors convicted on the basis that he didn’t seem sorry for what happened to his wife. From Mel and I’s perspective, they never proved she was dead; so what was there to be remorseful about? If he honestly believed she ran off to Russia, I would expect him to be pissed at being framed rather than sorry for something the prosecution couldn’t even prove happened. (As far as I know, they never did find the person with whom she opened that joint bank account.)

But, all that rationalization (and worse, identifying with) flew out the window today. The bastard did it, and he took the cops to the body. Buried in the woods behind where I used to live.

For all his ‘I’m special, so make allowances for me’ at the trial, I hope they lock him up and throw away the key. Hans Reiser makes geeks look bad.

Hans Reiser leads police to body, believed to be his wife
Henry K. Lee, Chronicle Staff Writer
Monday, July 7, 2008

07-07 18:32 PDT OAKLAND — Convicted murderer Hans Reiser led police today to what is believed to be the body of his wife, Nina, in Redwood Regional Park in the Oakland hills, authorities said.

The remains were found about 4 p.m. today buried next to a deer trail in the park, said Reiser s defense attorney, William Du Bois, who accompanied his client to the site.

They were joined by Oakland police, prosecutor Paul Hora and Alameda County district attorney s Inspector Bruce Brock, Du Bois said.

Authorities have gathered at a home at 8222 Skyline Blvd. to receive the remains.

Officer Roland Holmgren, Oakland police spokesman, said the body has not been identified. A news conference is scheduled for Tuesday.

Reiser, 44, was convicted by an Alameda County jury April 28 after a six-month trial in which the combative software programmer testified over 11 days that he was innocent of killing his 31-year-old wife, who had not been seen since Sept. 3, 2006.

Reiser is scheduled to be sentenced Wednesday and faces a maximum of 25 years to life. There was speculation that if Reiser led police to his wife s body, he could receive a reduced sentence.

Du Bois declined to address that issue in detail today, saying, We don t know. Talk to the DA.

But the defense attorney added, We re just trying to improve our position at this point.

Du Bois CONFIRMed that he and others had been urging Reiser to reveal the LOCATION of her body for some time. We ve talked a very long time about the subject – not only myself, but many other people, Du Bois said.

[ad#adsense-horizontal]

Obama is just another politician after all…

“Obama sought to walk the fine political line” is politically correct for selling out, for putting the election ahead of the people he seeks to be elected to represent, for caring more about what pundits and assholes (McCain) are saying about him that protecting the people from government tyranny.

Obama Supports FISA Legislation, Angering Left | The Trail | washingtonpost.com
By Paul Kane

Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) today announced his support for a sweeping intelligence surveillance law that has been heavily denounced by the liberal activists who have fueled the financial engines of his presidential campaign.

In his most substantive break with the Democratic Party’s base since becoming the presumptive nominee, Obama declared he will support the bill when it comes to a Senate vote, likely next week, despite misgivings about legal provisions for telecommunications corporations that cooperated with the Bush administration’s warrantless surveillance program of suspected terrorists.

In so doing, Obama sought to walk the fine political line between GOP accusations that he is weak on foreign policy — Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) called passing the legislation a “vital national security matter” — and alienating his base.

Move along, there is no Change to see here…

[ad#adsense-horizontal]

I use Amazon affiliate links in some of my posts. I think it is fair to say my writing is not influenced by the $0.40 I earned in 2022.